I’ve just received a flyer from the oranges. (New nickname for NDP — note oranges are not local, therefore unsustainable.)
Next Tuesday there will be a public meeting regarding the proposed transmission line into the Portlands. (Note again, who did NOT oppose the Portlands, simply advocated a lower capacity? Oranges.)
What shocked me though, was not the shameless self-promition. (I think we’re all used to that by now). But rather the ending sentence:
There are better sustainable options to building more nuclear and high voltage transmittion lines.
Though this could be confusing just to me, since I am ESL, it sounds like they are saying there is a sustainable way to get nuclear? Perhaps it is just bad wording.
I definitely plan to attend the discussion to get clear on the issue. I hope it will be more than just a case of NIMBYism in order to “green” themselves.